Journal of Other Forum Analysis (Volume II, Issue 2)

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

Although, as always, please don't put staff in danger.

Don't tell me what to do. 

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/trump-says-he%E2%80%99s-designating-far-left-anti-fascism-group-antifa-as-a-terrorist-organization.1301019/page-4#post-145319529

At this point, ResetEra will be designated as a terrorist think tank.

 

It's more of a "terrorist shit pit".

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

More importantly, can they play Concord?

You can only play Concord in Gaza.

[Taco Bell Tower]

Jeff can't stop going Full Nazi on the Nazi site:

Ironic Jeff Marvel Superman says that while no such thing exists at ResetEra.com

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

are you like, not brave enough to question the site owner? afraid of getting banned?

Every time he goes to sleep I take pictures of myself putting my balls in his mouth, so no, I'm not afraid of the site owner.

[HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth]

I also put Jansen's balls in there.

[HardcoreRetro]

More importantly, can they play Concord?

You can only play Concord in Gaza.

I guess that's why the jews are bombing them. Palestinians wouldn't let them play.

Reasonable response.

[Boredfrom]

The situation became a safety issue as Disney employees saw their emails doxxed, per the first source — some even received death threats.

Is nice to see neither side has principles.

[Gamegirl Nostalgia]

still no mass like giver role for my boys Taco Bell and HeavenIsAPlaceOnEarth?

Man maybe staff should be put in danger. 

[HaughtyFrank]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/chicago-pope-partners-with-chicago-restaurateur-chef-to-open-a-vatican-restaurant-dont-think-theyll-serve-chicago-deep-dish-pizza.1302243/#post-145355637

Good. That shit is a swimming pool for rats. If you can get drunk and drown in your pizza then it isn't a real pizza. It's a fucking casserole. The sauce is like a whore on the street corner: cold, alone, completely exposed and unwanted. Chicago-style pizza is an affront to all that is holy in this world--a fucking war crime without the war.

You mean, let me understand this cause, you know maybe it's me, it's a little fucked up maybe, but I'm funny how, I mean funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh, I'm here to fucking amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how? How am I funny?

If a rat can't drag a slice down the stairs without drowning, it's not real pizza!

i really dislike deep dish too but do we really gotta throw sex workers under the bus to take a shot at a plate of slop

I'm amused at B-Dubs trying to have some fun completely unaware about what is allowed on his own forum. Anyone else would absolutely get banned for the first joke

[Taco Bell Tower]

https://www.reddit.com/r/comicbooks/s/0ry0THvlJe
Wonder which Ree user is this

[benji]

https://www.reddit.com/r/comicbooks/s/0ry0THvlJe

Some incredible posts in there but if I have to pick just one:

[RetiredSkunk]

Bet Tatiana still takes that Disney check though.

[Potato]

I also put Jansen's balls in their.

Jansen has balls? 

[Eric Cartman]

Trump just has good taste.

I don't want to give the man too much credit, but I saw that Oscar show

[Eric Cartman]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/september-10-2025-charlie-kirk-assassinated-at-utah-valley-university-do-not-post-videos-of-incident-up-suspect-in-custody.1294083/page-244#post-145119489

 User banned (1 month): Concern trolling in a sensitive thread over multiple posts

We're just trying to honor Kirk's legacy properly

He's an asshole yes no question but making light of someone's murder just brings us down to his level no?

Interesting how 'grave dancing makes you look less of a human' is concern trolling (a bannable offence) but saying cis women having the right to spaces just for them is not the first step towards trans concentration camps is dismissing concerns (a bannable offence)

[Eric Cartman]

Fiction fires some indirect shoots at scuffed:

This.

A certain type of person will weaponize anything to attack "Israel". At the heart of it its just antisemitic bullshit. It muddies the waters and aids im the "any criticism about Israel is antisemitic" narrative.

if its funny you can keep doing it tho

[Eric Cartman]

I mean....Obama intervened in Libya without congress for longer than the 60-day War Powers resolution limit.  He assassinated an American citizen without judicial process because he was related to a terrorist, and killed a few other Americans with drone strikes, and never faced accountability for it.  He oversaw the NSA bulk data collection program on citizens and tried to expand DACA and DAPA with executive actions to take control of deportation deferrals....all that sounds kinda dictatorial, but yeah, not as exciting as a talk show host getting fired.

[Hap Shaughnessy]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/dc-comics-cancelled-red-hood-book-over-charlie-kirk-tweet.1294383/#post-144989610

 User Banned (2 Weeks): Concern Trolling over a Series of Posts

The man advocated for the summary execution of gays. Respectfully, shove this sentiment up your ass.

Thank you for the personal attack. I do not know enough about this person To properly judge, yeti still think violence should not be celebrated.

What if the person in question was calling for her death?

that's the eternal dilemma, isn't it? Does the cause justify the means?

This is "only" a general sentiment of mine, as I cannot judge this incident properly

[Eric Cartman]

Bit weird entirely predictable that Jimmy Kimmel - formerly cancelled on era for blackface and the man show - is now a folk hero, and all the people there that would lecture people about "its just jokes bro" not being a defence against cancellation are saying "its just jokes bro", innit?

[Eric Cartman]

https://www.resetera.com/threads/if-america-went-through-another-reconstruction-what-would-need-to-be-done.1302477/#post-145367811

COOL FORUM OF COOL NORMAL CONVERSATIONS

[Lonewulfeus]

I don't want to seem like I'm poo-pooing that Trump will threaten anyone, I feel like everyone knows my free speech radicalism and so wouldn't believe I would trust or defend Trump when I myself have been telling people he's never supported free speech and been frivolously suing and hating on the First Amendment since the 1980's. Trump himself as President and candidate has regularly threatened to take away broadcast licenses of entities that don't have them, which is one of the sources of MAGA Twitter constantly demanding this of entities that don't have them or inventing FCC rules that don't exist to enforce against them. Trump's beliefs about how defamation works is similarly more wrong than ever correct. He threatens this stuff nearly daily and people forget almost all of it. Even MAGA has forgotten that Fox News was the enemy.

My caution on this, or any topic where I may seem like I'm defending Trump, is that there are often multiple causes to things and not always the most overt. We know people are doxing and threatening all kinds of people over Kirk. It doesn't seem unreasonable to me to believe these same people are flooding red state affiliates who then turn around and threaten the network by pulling Kimmel and the network suspends him to get the affiliates off their back. Meanwhile Trump and Carr (and random MAGA women on Twitter) claim they (or their husband) did this because this is how they think things work, you yell something and the world bends. This is one of my constant themes on here against Era and similar in general, that their frustration at the world is that it doesn't work this way. One of the benefits of power, real power, is knowing when you don't have to listen. Bob Iger, who himself believed he needed to run for President in 2016, surely knows he doesn't have to listen to most any of this except the affiliates.

Do you think Kimmel would still be on the air if a democrat held the presidency all else being equal?  Would the mainstream media have covered Charlie Kirk’s assassination the same way?  Our president being so blatantly transactional makes me question the motives of any group doing something that would appear to appease him.  In this case, the affiliates, already largely run by conservatives as you mentioned, know they can use the removal of Kimmel as a way to get something they want from trump in the future.  Maybe that’s too conspiratorial, but I don’t think it’s outside the realm of possibility these days

[Eric Cartman]

I've understood that happened due to Gunn's old pedophile jokes. So, I always assumed the pressure for Disney came from the left.

Maybe I'm wrong about something.

Nope it was from this rightwing guy on twitter who just hated Gunn for being anti-Trump. And then people on the right bandwagoned.

FUCK YOU YOU GASLIGHTING CUNT

Historical re-enactment of Reseteras takes colorised:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/disney-severs-ties-with-james-gunn-after-controversial-tweets.56755/

Quick reminder: While it is possible for people to grow and change and ask forgiveness, that does not mean that everyone is required to forgive. The role of hate groups in this incident should not be overlooked, but simply feeling that Gunn's tweets were unforgivable does not make someone a member or sympathizer of said groups.

[Boredfrom]

The thing with Trump is that he operates like a (really stupid) mafia boss. He just “suggests”, he doesn’t necessarily order this stuff.

Corporations and nations know that they need to lick his balls and maybe he will actually pay attention to them long enough to do a favor (or his actual job, funny enough). The UK needed to treat him like a king just to him to acknowledge that Russia has no reason for a cease fire.

Modern Disney probably just doesn’t want to antagonize the government after the Desantis fiasco, and this was a good excuse to be in good graces and plan what to do Kimmel… just backfired horrible because a lot people are also not thrilled in making Charlie Kirk a martyr for MAGA.

[Snoopy]

I wonder if Nep is watching Candace Owens getting sued by the French and thinking, that could have been me.

[Boredfrom]

Would the mainstream media have covered Charlie Kirk’s assassination the same way?

I partially disagree in this part, given the violent nature of his murder and his reach even before Trump got elected. The big difference is probably how uncritical the mass media has been on how Kirk was as a person, but I also think that many are rationalizing as “don’t speak ill of the dead” or identify themselves as political pundits, not necessarily on the same side but “playing the game”.

[kaleidoscopium]

Never underestimate that there is really no left wing media, it's all right wing, ultra hateful right wing, to central right at best. So the same "pro what admin does" doesn't really work well with Dems, cause the media at large are conservative+ in nature and doesn't want to talk about it.

Heck, even on here, sometimes things are escued due to right wing talks, look at the work Biden did to get the train stuff approved, people only bashed him for forcing them back to work, but nothing about how he got what they wanted. Or like the fake crap like how dealing with Beyonce and Kamala in Texas with some dumb dumbs actually trying to paint a picture that she was somehow trying to win Texas (she wasn't it was about abortion). Remember when people were giving Kamala hell for trying to get on Rogan, and then the same damn idiots gave her hell after the election for not being on Rogan even after it came out Rogan stringed her along. There just not winning with some so called "allies" lol

https://www.resetera.com/threads/us-politics-2025-ot-taco-trump-and-the-big-beautiful-bullshit.1236576/page-64#post-145371609

[Lonewulfeus]

Would the mainstream media have covered Charlie Kirk’s assassination the same way?

I partially disagree in this part, given the violent nature of his murder and his reach even before Trump got elected. The big difference is probably how uncritical the mass media has been on how Kirk was as a person, but I also think that many are rationalizing as “don’t speak ill of the dead” or identify themselves as political pundits, not necessarily on the same side but “playing the game”.

Maybe at this point mainstream media in the US is an unsalvageable mess.  You didn’t see right wing media sanitizing pelosi after her husband was attacked.  One side says whatever it wants with no consequences and the other walks on eggshells to be as milquetoast as possible.  It’s pathetic.

[Eric Cartman]

Would the mainstream media have covered Charlie Kirk’s assassination the same way?

I partially disagree in this part, given the violent nature of his murder and his reach even before Trump got elected. The big difference is probably how uncritical the mass media has been on how Kirk was as a person, but I also think that many are rationalizing as “don’t speak ill of the dead” or identify themselves as political pundits, not necessarily on the same side but “playing the game”.

Maybe at this point mainstream media in the US is an unsalvageable mess.  You didn’t see right wing media sanitizing pelosi after her husband was attacked.  One side says whatever it wants with no consequences and the other walks on eggshells to be as milquetoast as possible.  It’s pathetic.

US politics is ridiculously partisan in the first place, and even more so on social media where everyone is acting like this:


But - and I am willing to concede I could be very wrong on this, because its not like I'm a fucking fan checking out their shit when it gets released - charlie kirk seems like he was a relatively moderate, albeit proactive, religious conservative. But he was also not a politician.

I think you kind of have to keep in perspective theres a difference between cheerleaders and the actual team, even if you are deep into politics as team sports.
If, fuck, I dunno, Rachel Maddow got shot in the fucking face, I think Fox News would still probably be generally against that.

[Lonewulfeus]

1758293468[/url]']

1758292972[/url]']

1758291848[/url]']

I partially disagree in this part, given the violent nature of his murder and his reach even before Trump got elected. The big difference is probably how uncritical the mass media has been on how Kirk was as a person, but I also think that many are rationalizing as “don’t speak ill of the dead” or identify themselves as political pundits, not necessarily on the same side but “playing the game”.

Maybe at this point mainstream media in the US is an unsalvageable mess.  You didn’t see right wing media sanitizing pelosi after her husband was attacked.  One side says whatever it wants with no consequences and the other walks on eggshells to be as milquetoast as possible.  It’s pathetic.

US politics is ridiculously partisan in the first place, and even more so on social media where everyone is acting like this:


But - and I am willing to concede I could be very wrong on this, because its not like I'm a fucking fan checking out their shit when it gets released - charlie kirk seems like he was a relatively moderate, albeit proactive, religious conservative. But he was also not a politician.

I think you kind of have to keep in perspective theres a difference between cheerleaders and the actual team, even if you are deep into politics as team sports.
If, fuck, I dunno, Rachel Maddow got shot in the fucking face, I think Fox News would still probably be generally against that.

I have no problem with the media being against his murder, that’s a perfectly cromulent position to hold.  It’s the sanitizing his image that I have a problem with.  There is no way in hell Fox News would resist showing unflattering clips of Maddow in the event she was murdered.  That’s not how they operate and it’s not what their viewers want.  They’d have a greatest hits of her calling for free access to abortion and or whatever else her left wing positions are.